1992-10-13 - Mr. Squirrel? Just who is who here?

Header Data

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: CYPHERPUNKS@TOAD.COM
Message Hash: a529ffcb0e842a6e9c06a5383ffcccf371e0f82990315ad61805d7f2c4e8c9d1
Message ID: <9210131610.AA25466@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9210131201.AA12086@domingo.teracons.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-10-13 16:03:14 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 09:03:14 PDT

Raw message

From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 09:03:14 PDT
To: CYPHERPUNKS@TOAD.COM
Subject: Mr. Squirrel?  Just who is who here?
In-Reply-To: <9210131201.AA12086@domingo.teracons.com>
Message-ID: <9210131610.AA25466@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Hugh asks how, in a broadcast network, we may verify identity.  The
answer is "statistically."  Not everyone needs to verify each message;
only those who communicate with the sender personally (and who thus
know the private keys) need to.

Hugh mentions the "one-on-one signed signature method" and that it is
not applicable to broadcast.  Well, signing the whole message is not,
but signing a message digest is.  This is the whole reason for message
digests, that a message may go out in cleartext, but the validating
information for that message be encrypted.  Thus everyone can read the
message, even without knowledge of the public key, but it is possible
to verify the identity if you know it, i.e. you know the private key.

Eric





Thread