1992-10-23 - TEMPEST

Header Data

From: jjaloszyns@bluejay.mich.fred.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a68834910ef722a8cdb2bdb018e2d14f1448f1a791c029752a7401a7ff869af0
Message ID: <9210231704.AA25073@home.merit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-10-23 17:04:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Oct 92 10:04:47 PDT

Raw message

From: jjaloszyns@bluejay.mich.fred.org
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 92 10:04:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: TEMPEST
Message-ID: <9210231704.AA25073@home.merit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


There has been quite a bit of concern about certain people (agencies)
using a TEMPEST machine and invading privacy.  Most of the things to
defeat this that have been taked about have revolved around shielding. 
What would be the problem with having another device to emit random
signals on the same frequency that your monitor operates on?  Has this
already been implimented?  Legal?  
 
jon

<jjaloszyns@bluejay.mich.fred.org> ------------- 43.31.28N, 84.41.41W 
Jon Jaloszynski
Student 9-12 at Shepherd HS,  Shepherd                     Shepherd, MI






Thread