1992-11-09 - Re: Analysis of cost to produce random serail generator.
Header Data
From: pozar@kumr.lns.com (Tim Pozar)
To: crunch@netcom.com (John Draper)
Message Hash: 3de4239d0a7796712031d11148bfd6fd8105e825c351137a76c0688400af6096
Message ID: <m0moiDw-0000egC@kumr.lns.com>
Reply To: <9211092136.AA25999@netcom2.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-09 23:09:09 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 15:09:09 PST
Raw message
From: pozar@kumr.lns.com (Tim Pozar)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 15:09:09 PST
To: crunch@netcom.com (John Draper)
Subject: Re: Analysis of cost to produce random serail generator.
In-Reply-To: <9211092136.AA25999@netcom2.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <m0moiDw-0000egC@kumr.lns.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Draper wrote:
> [...]
> So, it is clear that the cost is rather high,
> [...]
> Although, it IS possible to use a cesium noise source
> [...]
> John D.
Geez... What happened to the idea of using a reversed-biased diode?
That into a cheapy A/D and into a UART, should do the trick...
Tim
--
Internet: pozar@kumr.lns.com FidoNet: Tim Pozar @ 1:125/555
UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr.lns.com!pozar
Snail: Tim Pozar / KKSF / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108 / USA
Voice: +1 415 788 2022
Thread
Return to November 1992
- Return to “crunch@netcom.com (John Draper)”
- Return to “pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)”
Return to “pozar@kumr.lns.com (Tim Pozar)”
- 1992-11-09 (Mon, 9 Nov 92 13:39:59 PST) - Analysis of cost to produce random serail generator. - crunch@netcom.com (John Draper)
- 1992-11-09 (Mon, 9 Nov 92 15:09:09 PST) - Re: Analysis of cost to produce random serail generator. - pozar@kumr.lns.com (Tim Pozar)
- 1992-11-09 (Mon, 9 Nov 92 15:09:26 PST) - Analysis of cost to produce random serail generator. - pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)