1992-11-13 - DC 2600 mtg

Header Data

From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
To: strat@intercon.com
Message Hash: e8af15b8b2ffb28c552fde0a1167c7269c497b43a195b965924b1130f4acc6ef
Message ID: <9211131539.AA23245@newsu.shearson.com>
Reply To: <9211121425.AA32211@horton.intercon.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-13 16:03:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 08:03:32 PST

Raw message

From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 08:03:32 PST
To: strat@intercon.com
Subject: DC 2600 mtg
In-Reply-To: <9211121425.AA32211@horton.intercon.com>
Message-ID: <9211131539.AA23245@newsu.shearson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From: Bob Stratton <strat@intercon.com>

>Hi all...

>I was at the latter part of the Washington 2600 meeting, feel free to ask me 
>questions if you want.

>By the way, today's article about the event was yet another example of the 
>media promoting hysteria about technologically competent people. The whole 
>article was of the "A hacker is someone who breaks into systems" model. It 
>makes me sick, and I think that the crypto community (the part NOT employed 
>by DoD) is next for this sort of misrepresentation.

Pardon, but isn't 2600 magazine a magazine by crackers for crackers?
2600 is named after frequency of the disconnect tone used in blue
boxes, isn't it? What I'm afraid of is that I will get confused with
one of them -- I'm not sure they are necessarily being misrepresented.

The tragedies come when idiots raid Steve Jackson Games and sieze
copies of "Cyberpunk" instead of shutting down the infants breaking
into TRW. Blurring the distinction between hackers and crackers is the
last thing we need.

Perry





Thread