1992-12-30 - Anonymous Reply Capability (re: Self Addressed Stamped…)

Header Data

From: yanek@novavax.nova.edu (Yanek Martinson)
To: Marc.Ringuette@GS80.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Message Hash: 608332db7cd08325f97cca65040004fb4be35ab1743489f3ce6161b758279485
Message ID: <9212300033.AA07511@novavax.nova.edu>
Reply To: <9212292310.AA23801@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-30 00:33:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:33:58 PST

Raw message

From: yanek@novavax.nova.edu (Yanek Martinson)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:33:58 PST
To: Marc.Ringuette@GS80.SP.CS.CMU.EDU
Subject: Anonymous Reply Capability (re: Self Addressed Stamped...)
In-Reply-To: <9212292310.AA23801@toad.com>
Message-ID: <9212300033.AA07511@novavax.nova.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> unique ID for that mail, which it creates and saves.  The recipient
> can just use the 'reply' command of his mailer.  When the remailer
> gets mail with this unique ID, it plugs in the old return address, 
> retracing its original path.

For best security with a mix-net remailer, it should immediately
forget where a message came from.  

So if you want anonymous reply capability, the remailer could create
that unique id, but instead of associating it with a return address,
associate it with a public key (transmitted along with the message).

Then when someone sends a reply, the remailer would encrypt it with
the public key, and broadcast it.  You monitor the broacasts for
ones with public keys that match private keys you have.



--
Yanek Martinson    mthvax.cs.miami.edu!safe0!yanek     uunet!medexam!yanek
this address preferred -->> yanek@novavax.nova.edu <<-- this address preferred
Phone (305) 765-6300 daytime   FAX: (305) 765-6708  1321 N 65 Way/Hollywood
      (305) 963-1931 evenings       (305) 981-9812  Florida, 33024-5819





Thread