1993-01-06 - Re: A solution remailer signature suppression

Header Data

From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
To: edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)
Message Hash: 50cf7865684d1fe1dfaa990648c7bb7dbec2d4c6e5fb5bfdafbe6df06b878a90
Message ID: <9301061648.AA16517@toad.com>
Reply To: <1k4PwB7w165w@spectrx.saigon.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-06 16:48:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 08:48:52 PST

Raw message

From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 08:48:52 PST
To: edgar@spectrx.Saigon.COM (Edgar W. Swank)
Subject: Re: A solution remailer signature suppression
In-Reply-To: <1k4PwB7w165w@spectrx.saigon.com>
Message-ID: <9301061648.AA16517@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


count me on the side of those folks who feel that remailers (and
mailers, for that matter) should keep their hands off the body of
the message.

furthermore, any editor that changes a file without being told to
(e.g., by stripping blanks) is (imho) broken.

edgar, you say:

> This system I use doesn't allow me to run my own software, so I
> think this idea wouldn't work for me, in any case.

that is probably not the sort of system you want to use if you are
interested in the privacy and integrity of your work.

	peter





Thread