1993-01-26 - Re: Coupled programs

Header Data

From: Mitra <mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us>
To: N/A
Message Hash: 98f0567e60d003cdb18d61538a8a80043d897cd2b3c21a650d9d7eaae686a26e
Message ID: <C1FxCF.757@pandora.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: <9301252308.AA11480@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-26 02:57:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 18:57:10 PST

Raw message

From: Mitra <mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 18:57:10 PST
Subject: Re: Coupled programs
In-Reply-To: <9301252308.AA11480@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <C1FxCF.757@pandora.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Eric Hughes (hughes@soda.berkeley.edu) wrote:
: This is exactly the goal.  For example, zmodem has a widespread
: deployment and a public specification.  What needs to happen for
: cryptography is the development of such protocols for key exchange,
: signatures, and other cryptographic entities.

I thought that was the point of PEM? Why not integrate the PGP
encryption protocol into the PEM structure?

- Mitra

Thread

• Return to January 1993

• Return to “Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>”
• Return to “Mitra <mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us>”

• Return to “mjr@netcom.com (Matthew Rapaport)”

• 1993-01-25 (Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:34:55 PST) - Coupled programs and security by obfuscation - mjr@netcom.com (Matthew Rapaport)
  • 1993-01-25 (Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:09:59 PST) - Coupled programs - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
    • 1993-01-26 (Mon, 25 Jan 93 18:57:10 PST) - Re: Coupled programs - Mitra <mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us>
      • 1993-01-27 (Tue, 26 Jan 93 19:41:31 PST) - Coupled programs - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
  • 1993-01-25 (Mon, 25 Jan 93 15:20:38 PST) - security by obfuscation - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>