1993-02-22 - Re: Beware of anon.penet.fi message!
Header Data
From: David Reeve Sward <sward+@cmu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6407f158933fa7ff1cf436956388084351f6a1a21684a7c0b95fefec4cf7e75a
Message ID: <YfWIGZe00iV346rPEa@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <9302222044.AA22982@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-22 21:27:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 13:27:17 PST
Raw message
From: David Reeve Sward <sward+@cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 93 13:27:17 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Beware of anon.penet.fi message!
In-Reply-To: <9302222044.AA22982@toad.com>
Message-ID: <YfWIGZe00iV346rPEa@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Excerpts from list.cypherpunks: 22-Feb-93 Beware of anon.penet.fi mes..
by nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu
> These are serious problems. We need some discussion of how to avoid these
> simple tricks for defeating the anonymity while still having an easy-to-use
> system.
Perhaps a new header such as
X-Anon-Doubleblind: yes|no
defaulting to yes...? As was said, the doubleblind system is a great
idea, but incomplete if you want to correspond to someone without
revealing your anon id.
--
David Sward sward+@cmu.edu
Thread
Return to February 1993
- Return to “David Reeve Sward <sward+@cmu.edu>”
- Return to “Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>”
Return to “nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu”
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 12:44:13 PST) - Beware of anon.penet.fi message! - nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 13:27:17 PST) - Re: Beware of anon.penet.fi message! - David Reeve Sward <sward+@cmu.edu>
- 1993-02-23 (Tue, 23 Feb 93 04:52:26 PST) - Re: Beware of anon.penet.fi message! - Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
- 1993-02-22 (Mon, 22 Feb 93 13:27:17 PST) - Re: Beware of anon.penet.fi message! - David Reeve Sward <sward+@cmu.edu>