1993-02-07 - Re: Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems

Header Data

From: Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
To: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
Message Hash: 90e81f3aac24f8a7462f840e36a11256b531c8019c56ec2701d604e2e863b4e7
Message ID: <9302070605.AA27822@hodge>
Reply To: <m0nKvtB-000jrIC@phantom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-07 06:06:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Feb 93 22:06:54 PST

Raw message

From: Marc Horowitz <marc@Athena.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 93 22:06:54 PST
To: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
Subject: Re: Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems
In-Reply-To: <m0nKvtB-000jrIC@phantom.com>
Message-ID: <9302070605.AA27822@hodge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>> Of course, if the FBI's Digital Telephony act passes it would be illegal to
>> sell such devices if they do not have a back door.  

Not True.

The proposed legislation states:

	  (a)  Providers of electronic communication services and private 
    branch exchange operators shall provide within the United States 
    capability and capacity for the government to intercept wire and 
    electronic communications when authorized by law:  

This law does not prevent *users* from providing *end-to-end*
encryption.

This does not mean that they might not try to remove this right in the
future, but they haven't gone that far yet.

		Marc





Thread