1993-02-07 - Re: Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems

Header Data

From: Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>
To: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
Message Hash: 9e31d0140720c74effd21912ba30547c44308837e98cd1d7893c1b7a1f4835db
Message ID: <9302070615.AA19855@edev0.TFS>
Reply To: <m0nKvtB-000jrIC@phantom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-07 06:16:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Feb 93 22:16:48 PST

Raw message

From: Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 93 22:16:48 PST
To: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
Subject: Re: Compressed/Encrypted Voice using Modems
In-Reply-To: <m0nKvtB-000jrIC@phantom.com>
Message-ID: <9302070615.AA19855@edev0.TFS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>
>And why are you limiting this to V.32 (9600bps)?  V.32bis (14.4k bps) modem
>chips cost maybe 20% more than v.32 chips in quantity.
>


at Interopt I heard some voice demos that were at 9600 4800 and 2400 baud
the 2400 sounded a phoneme chip but was *very* resionable.


		-Pete






Thread