1993-03-05 - ANON: My remailer

Header Data

From: tribble@memex.com (E. Dean Tribble)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 37c2072caa94c2f7d69db44630c31302c2cd6e8063381bb515262b2a1876ba13
Message ID: <9303041907.AA03744@memexis.memex.com>
Reply To: <9303032218.AA03614@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-05 08:45:36 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Mar 93 00:45:36 PST

Raw message

From: tribble@memex.com (E. Dean Tribble)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 93 00:45:36 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: ANON: My remailer
In-Reply-To: <9303032218.AA03614@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9303041907.AA03744@memexis.memex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


				Enough rambling--I'm sorry to see a remailer demise and hope
	 that mine will not fall under the unethical clause here.  If I find
	 a solution, you will be the first to know.

This is not intended as pressure.   Coudln't you argue with their
conclusion that it is unethical?  If they were to make such a claim,
it would certainly be a good opportunity to push them on the issue of
free speech.

dean

Thread

• Return to March 1993

• Return to “babani@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Rusty Babani)”
• Return to “dclunie@pax.tpa.com.au (David Clunie)”
• Return to “nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Chael Hall)”

• Return to “tribble@memex.com (E. Dean Tribble)”

• 1993-03-03 (Wed, 3 Mar 93 13:56:04 PST) - Re: ANON: My remailer - dclunie@pax.tpa.com.au (David Clunie)
  • 1993-03-03 (Wed, 3 Mar 93 14:29:42 PST) - Re: ANON: My remailer - nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Chael Hall)
    • 1993-03-04 (Wed, 3 Mar 93 18:27:29 PST) - Re: ANON: My remailer - babani@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Rusty Babani)
    • 1993-03-05 (Fri, 5 Mar 93 00:45:36 PST) - ANON: My remailer - tribble@memex.com (E. Dean Tribble)