1993-03-26 - Re: Many Important Items in the News

Header Data

From: “L. Detweiler” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 45128e554b65ec3623992d511b11fb0cd07cde25f257701b6c4e53c1633b8877
Message ID: <9303262110.AA06813@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply To: <9303260756.AA24450@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-26 21:12:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 13:12:13 PST

Raw message

From: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 13:12:13 PST
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Many Important Items in the News
In-Reply-To: <9303260756.AA24450@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9303262110.AA06813@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>All the more reason to allow the backbone admins the power to not pass
>anonymous articles.  It won't work, they'll feel like they're in
>control, and everyone wins.

wait, are you advocating news admins allowed to filter anonymous mail
from downstream/upstream feeds?  I don't get this.






Thread