1993-03-01 - Re: header field indicating an anonymous address

Header Data

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 609183cf95d07b0e6add7bfa13ea3d900d1b760714d5f42772e25322f585abee
Message ID: <9303011241.aa07850@penet.penet.FI>
Reply To: <9303010202.AA17864@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-01 11:29:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:29:49 PST

Raw message

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:29:49 PST
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: header field indicating an anonymous address
In-Reply-To: <9303010202.AA17864@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9303011241.aa07850@penet.penet.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> I suggest "Anon-Sender:".  There's already a "Sender:" field in
> RFC-822, indicating who sent the message, as separate from who wrote
> the message.  The "Anon-Sender:" field should contain an email address
> for the maintainer of the remailer. 

Anon.penet.fi has supported the Sender: field from the start. This has
forced me to use an automatic script that send a message like this:
(it gets to handle 20-30 messages/day)

I don't think this was intended for me (anon@penet.fi, the anon server
administrator, also working under names "daemon" and "julf"). I suppose you
wanted to send it to an<something>@anon.penet.fi, but accidentally replied to
the envelope "Sender:" address instead of the "From:" orginator address...

	Julf





Thread