1993-03-12 - Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?

Header Data

From: Mark C. Henderson <markh@wimsey.bc.ca>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 65922f15c3526dd9bb9d96749044651a57c64251ad4e24decbadbcf5538154ab
Message ID: <m0nX3q7-0000VfC@squirrel.wimsey.bc.ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-12 07:18:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Mar 93 23:18:36 PST

Raw message

From: Mark C. Henderson <markh@wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 93 23:18:36 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
Message-ID: <m0nX3q7-0000VfC@squirrel.wimsey.bc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?

On Mar 11, 21:16, Michael Brennan wrote:
} Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNKS=EMAIL HARASSEMENT?
} 
} Brushing this matter aside as a non-issue and pretending there is no
} problem will not make the problem go away! UNSUBSCRIBE REQUESTS SENT TO
} CYPHERPUNKS-REQUEST ARE BEING IGNORED!!!

Well, sending a 3000 line file to hundreds of people, wasn't the
correct response to the situation.

But, to add something constructive, why don't we use majordomo to 
handle list additions and delections automatically? 

Mark

- -- 
Mark Henderson
mch@squirrel.wimsey.bc.ca
markh@wimsey.bc.ca

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.2

iQCVAgUBK6A2sPfE/ap/JEqpAQEK6AQAqejFaX3122HwrkLibTYr/rEGEoL6qpSv
sSn2oVxoOJXc+R52P8RCZzfp/X0O5tp92tUf4sAL2YKIlb72W2y9rXZ9TXMxpmxi
AgRqqpts1uoKAfUMBaM9Lr0QJ2V7fnMRjOJiu2mU/bSbC4Tzr15reKjmhkQDDZXo
FoybTVchSEw=
=3DYZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread