1993-04-25 - Re: Consumer phone privacy info sheet

Header Data

From: rustman@netcom.com (Rusty Hodge)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4cc38a27d0f0624cbebede12b3126c1ea5be7587d4820268cb53890c41b97c62
Message ID: <9304251856.AA12774@netcom2.netcom.com>
Reply To: <m0nmvrE-000i30C@techbook.techbook.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-25 18:56:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 25 Apr 93 11:56:34 PDT

Raw message

From: rustman@netcom.com (Rusty Hodge)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 93 11:56:34 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Consumer phone privacy info sheet
In-Reply-To: <m0nmvrE-000i30C@techbook.techbook.com>
Message-ID: <9304251856.AA12774@netcom2.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Companies which use primarily multichannel fiber optic lines are 
> physically more difficult to tap.

Don't think so.  Unless you have fiber running from your location (your home)
to the calling party's location.

The tap is placed on the subscriber loop - which for the time being is analog
for most voice service.  And even if it is digital, it is still copper from
the CO.

If you are concerned with eavesdropping, then your statement is accurate.
It is very easy to eavesdrop on microwave and satellite long distance.

I suspect the Clipper chip will be used heavily in digital cellular phones,
if it isn't too much of a power hog.

-- 





Thread