1993-05-21 - Re: Consider “Working Assets” phone service instead of AT&T

Header Data

From: jet@nas.nasa.gov (J. Eric Townsend)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 711164355eac95fe88ca71bc3d95b7686444c685ebbc244d34d67392871c62ea
Message ID: <9305211821.AA19054@boxer.nas.nasa.gov>
Reply To: <199305210935.AA00447@well.sf.ca.us>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-21 18:21:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 May 93 11:21:27 PDT

Raw message

From: jet@nas.nasa.gov (J. Eric Townsend)
Date: Fri, 21 May 93 11:21:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  Consider "Working Assets" phone service instead of AT&T
In-Reply-To: <199305210935.AA00447@well.sf.ca.us>
Message-ID: <9305211821.AA19054@boxer.nas.nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


George A. Gleason writes:
 > Phonecard-only account: minor inconvenience to support a major principle.

You miss my point -- I *can't* get an account with them because I
don't have a phone line to tie it to.  There is a phone where I stay,
but it's not mine.

So, I'm stuck with US Splint.

Thread

• Return to May 1993

• Return to “George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>”
• Return to “jet@nas.nasa.gov (J. Eric Townsend)”
• Return to “Patrick Tufts <zippy@berry.cs.brandeis.edu>”

• Return to “pigeon@idr.org (Larissa Carlson)”

• 1993-05-21 (Fri, 21 May 93 02:35:39 PDT) - Re: Consider “Working Assets” phone service instead of AT&T - George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
  • 1993-05-21 (Fri, 21 May 93 07:16:11 PDT) - Consider “Working Assets” phone service instead of AT&T - Patrick Tufts <zippy@berry.cs.brandeis.edu>
    • 1993-05-22 (Fri, 21 May 93 18:18:40 PDT) - Consider “Working Assets” phone service instead of AT&T - pigeon@idr.org (Larissa Carlson)
  • 1993-05-21 (Fri, 21 May 93 11:21:27 PDT) - Re: Consider “Working Assets” phone service instead of AT&T - jet@nas.nasa.gov (J. Eric Townsend)