1993-05-25 - Oregon, guns, etc.

Header Data

From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: df48e25934e8d82c1faa3e749a9324391a2c915d8bebe8401d5ef2a48e567311
Message ID: <eyX34B1w164w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-25 00:50:11 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 24 May 93 17:50:11 PDT

Raw message

From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Mon, 24 May 93 17:50:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Oregon, guns, etc.
Message-ID: <eyX34B1w164w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Brad Cox (bcox@gmu.edu) writes:

> >I'm sure lots of people could give examples of areas where "everyone"
> >*is* armed, and while they certainly don't rely on "the government"
> >(i.e., local police forces) for protection, most would agree the
> >situation is not desirable ...
>
> Yep. Switzerland for sure (every draft age citizen keeps an assault rifle
> and ammo). Similarly for most US rural states; Oregon, South Carolina,
> Texas and Arizona come to mind. So do shooting ranges and guns shows most
> anywhere.

This is absolutely untrue of Oregon - at least in the Willamette Valley.
I see fewer guns (and gun-racks in pickup trucks) here than I did when I
lived in Southern California.

It is difficult for me to express how uninterested I am in the prospect
of debating gun control here in cypherpunks. I will compromise with
"very, very, uninterested."


--
Greg Broiles                            greg@goldenbear.com
Golden Bear Computer Consulting         +1 503 465 0325
Box 12005 Eugene OR 97440               BBS: +1 503 687 7764





Thread