1993-05-13 - Re: CALLER ID?

Header Data

From: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Message Hash: efb6fd6d36c874dd404af8811edc13d7dd954ff58c77ed79723df851518cbd4f
Message ID: <9305130728.AA49407@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Reply To: <9305130711.AA03137@servo>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-13 07:28:25 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 May 93 00:28:25 PDT

Raw message

From: rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 13 May 93 00:28:25 PDT
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Subject: Re: CALLER ID?
In-Reply-To: <9305130711.AA03137@servo>
Message-ID: <9305130728.AA49407@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Phil Karn writes:
> 
> Well, gee. If I can avoid caller ID and 800 number ANI by simply using
> any old cellular carrier for $0.40/minute (cheaper off peak), then why
> should I pay $1.95/minute for the same service to 1-900-STOPPER?
> 
> Yeah, I know, that $1.95 probably includes the long distance portion too,
> but I doubt there are any ordinary domestic calls that cost as much as
> $1.55/minute...
> 
> Phil

  I sent this out before, but it got lost.

  You can avoid ANIs for $0.00 in most areas by dialing your local
operator and saying "Could you please dial this 800 number, I am having
problems getting through to it." The ANI returns a bogus number, and
toll free operator assistance costs nothing here (C&P bell). 
 

-- Ray Cromwell        |    Engineering is the implementation of science;    --
-- EE/Math Student     |       politics is the implementation of faith.      --
-- rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu  |                         - Zetetic Commentaries      --




Thread