1993-06-22 - Re: one reaction: early FOIA results

Header Data

From: “George A. Gleason” <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9348a199f3821aa1e0bc11e190f28bcfb50c02de2bed26df4e0c4c6affdf769a
Message ID: <93Jun22.030531pdt.13994-3@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-22 10:05:56 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 03:05:56 PDT

Raw message

From: "George A. Gleason" <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 03:05:56 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  one reaction: early FOIA results
Message-ID: <93Jun22.030531pdt.13994-3@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Re AT&T being "incentivised;" again, I'd like to suggest it's time to
dis-incentivise them like right now.  If you're on AT&T long distance,
change your carrier.  If you're using an AT&T phone system, replace it with
anything else.  

It would be interesting to find out that magic number of phones which AT&T
were promised under the Federal contract.  Then we can either a) set that as
a target for business phone systems getting rid of AT&T, i.e. one for one;
or b) figure out what the revenues would be and get an equivalent amount in
disconnected AT&T long distance (this one could be done on a gross dollar
equivalent amount, assuming one year's worth of service is the relevant
gross dollar value of a given client), or c) *both.*  Well....?

-gg





Thread