1993-06-28 - Re: Remailer at rebma.mn.org

Header Data

From: nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c01fa3462320a2dc01f341788a7b2fede9c34b9d8aad9009b7e0cd33808370a8
Message ID: <9306281231.AA19866@pmantis.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-28 12:30:19 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Jun 93 05:30:19 PDT

Raw message

From: nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 93 05:30:19 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer at rebma.mn.org
Message-ID: <9306281231.AA19866@pmantis.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> * Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS
> 
>  Uu> My apologies to anyone who has tried to use the anonymous remailer at
>  Uu> rebma.mn.org in the past several weeks.
> 
>  Uu> I  imagine that people who weren't successful were
>  Uu> experimenters who chalked up the failure to something they'd done
>  Uu> wrong.
> 
> I did, indeed!
> 
>  Uu> It's working again, now.
> 
>  Uu> Here's the PGP key.
> 
> 
> Does this remailer _require_ an encrypted header, or will it take the
> |
> |       ::
> |       Request-Remailing-To:
> |
> plaintext command?

From dmandl@lehman.com:

It is indeed working OK now.  Encryption is not required.  Good to see this
remailer back up, especially because it introduces a long delay, making traffic
analysis more difficult.  FYI, sending a message to myself (in NYC) through
this remailer, it took about 15 hours for it to come back.  This is either very
good or very bad depending on your purposes.  Bad for urgent messages, good for
more...er...sensitive applications.

   --Dave.





Thread