1993-07-22 - Re: Encrypted data across international lines

Header Data

From: khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)
To: ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu (L. Detweiler)
Message Hash: 0d535ea2ab29952372b1c8d7da58c793b2b94286bd9c7f61a2dee76615897912
Message ID: <m0oIq5y-00029gC@warrior>
Reply To: <9307212331.AA04712@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-22 02:44:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Jul 93 19:44:51 PDT

Raw message

From: khijol!erc@apple.com (Ed Carp)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 93 19:44:51 PDT
To: ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu (L. Detweiler)
Subject: Re: Encrypted data across international lines
In-Reply-To: <9307212331.AA04712@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message-ID: <m0oIq5y-00029gC@warrior>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> The FCC prohibits the use of codes in amateur radio transmissions, and
> violations are sufficient to revoke the license. This is enforced by

Well, yes and no.  The FCC prohibits the use or codes, ciphers, or anything
else whose primary purpose is to obscure the meaning of the message.  On
the other hand, compression, since its primary purpose is not to obscure,
is OK.  But it sure makes it hard for the average Joe Blow ham to read my
packet traffic.  Not that I have anything to hide, but doubling my throughput
on a 1200 baud half-duplex session is sort of important to me. :)
-- 
Ed Carp				erc@apple.com			510/659-9560
"Disagreements are not meant to be challenges.  They are just a different
 reality."  -- Risa D'Angeles
DISCLAIMER:  I work for me ... what's it to you? :)




Thread