1993-07-09 - REMAILER: really anon?

Header Data

From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a2c950971bc036fcec792d50e71e15d626cf2b686039ad1b57650bec52d52d53
Message ID: <9307092121.AA24627@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-09 21:21:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Jul 93 14:21:52 PDT

Raw message

From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 93 14:21:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: REMAILER: really anon?
Message-ID: <9307092121.AA24627@tamsun.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


If you can trace the origin (sender) of this message please send me mail
personally rather than to the list.  I'm using my favorite remailer here
and I want to make sure it's working right.  

I have sent mail to the below sites as a test for anonymous remailing
returns and to see what headers I get back. It has been maybe 4 days now
since I began this experiment, some of the sites below have still not
remailed my test message.

My main curiosity in this quest is to determine what each header will look
like when the mail is recieved.  I think this is important in determining
which remailer to use.  

The below is the list of remailers with the "unique header to remailer" info
below each site number.  

If you wish to discuss this matter further, please send a follow up
message to the cypher list with your address included and "Re: Unique
header".  I'm really not too concerned about remaining anonymous (that is,
I will come out of hiding), I just want to see if this scheme is really
airtight! 

Thanks!
-z

 **Please take note of remailer 12 of this list.**

The typical header received looks similar to the below:
(I have removed the date, time, etc. to protect my privacy) 

From rebma!remailer@kksys.mn.org Thu Jul x 00:38:01 1993
Received: by ahost.some.school.edu (5.57/Ultrix3.0/cc-ix.mc-1.5)
	id AA02491; Thu, x Jul 93 19:00:54 -0500
Received: from kksys.mn.org by uum1.mn.org with bsmtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #3) id m0oE6Du-00007JC; Thu,x Jul 93 00:21 CDT
Received: from rebma by kksys.mn.org with uucp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #13) id m0oE5jG-0007TsC; Thu,x Jul 93 00:50 CDT
Received: by rebma.rebma.mn.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #1)
	id m0oE6nS-0002CzC; Thu, 8 Jul 93 17:58 PDT
Message-Id: <m0oE6nS-0002CzC@rebma.rebma.mn.org>
Date: Thu, x Jul 93 17:58 PDT
To: me@myhost.some.school.edu
From: nobody@rebma.rebma.mn.org
Subject: 9
Remailed-By: Mr. Nobody <remailer@rebma.mn.org>
Status: O


=========This is where the list of remailers begins===========

*** Please keep in mind that in the below I included only the "unique to
*** remailer" parts of the header.***

 1: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu 

From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
To: omitted
X-Remailed-By: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
X-Ttl: 0
X-Notice: This message was forwarded by a software-
	  automated anonymous remailing service.

 2: hh@cicada.berkeley.edu 

From: nobody@cicada.berkeley.edu

 3: hh@pmantis.berkeley.edu 

No response after 4 days

 4: hh@soda.berkeley.edu 

From: nobody@soda.berkeley.edu
Remailed-By: Eric Hollander <hh@soda.berkeley.edu>

 5: 00x@uclink.berkeley.edu 

From: nobody@uclink.berkeley.edu
Remailed-By: Tommy the Tourist <tommy@out>

 6: hal@alumni.caltech.edu 

From: nobody@alumni.cco.caltech.edu
Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the From
 line.  It is from an automated software remailing service operating at
 that address.  Please report problem mail to <hal@alumni.caltech.edu>.

 7: ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu 

From: nobody@eli-remailer
Remailed-By: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Source-Info:  From (or Sender) name not authenticated.

 8: phantom@mead.u.washington.edu 

No response after 4 days

 9: remailer@rebma.mn.org (this reply took almost 3+ days!)

From: nobody@rebma.rebma.mn.org
Remailed-By: Mr. Nobody <remailer@rebma.mn.org>

10: elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu 

From: nobody@rosebud.ee.uh.edu

11: hfinney@shell.portal.com 

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the From
 line.  It is from an automated software remailing service operating at
 that address.  Please report problem mail to <hfinney@shell.portal.com>.

12: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu 

From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
Remailed-By: Anonymous <remail@tamsun.tamu.edu>

Received: by tamsun.tamu.edu id AA04104
  (5.65b/IDA-1.4.3 for you@yourhost); Tue, 6 Jul 93 04:15:57 -0500

you@yourhost = your address! ...really!

13: remail@tamaix.tamu.edu 

From: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
Remailed-By: Anonymous <remail@tamsun.tamu.edu>

14: remailer@utter.dis.org 

Received: by soda.berkeley.edu (5.65/KAOS-1)
	id AA13859; Tue, 6 Jul 93 03:09:09 -0700
Received: by merde.dis.org (4.1/SMI-4.2)
	id AA04354; Tue, 6 Jul 93 03:11:48 PDT
From: nobody@dis.org
Remailed-By: remailer bogus account <remailer@utter.dis.org>

15: remail@extropia.wimsey.com 

No response after 4 days


NOTES: 
#1-#5		no encryption of remailing requests
#6-#14		support encrypted remailing requests
#15		special - header and message must be encrypted together
#9,#14,#15	introduce larger than average delay (not direct connect)
#9,#14,#15      running on privately owned machines





Thread