1993-07-15 - Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)

Header Data

From: cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)
To: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Message Hash: fbcb1affc96cf9958fa4184c535298b3d53383797cbabd4ac42b96dbe5a44db5
Message ID: <9307152009.AA15744@indirect.com>
Reply To: <9307151828.AA08970@banff.procase.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-15 20:11:16 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 13:11:16 PDT

Raw message

From: cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 13:11:16 PDT
To: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Subject: Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
In-Reply-To: <9307151828.AA08970@banff.procase.com>
Message-ID: <9307152009.AA15744@indirect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
> which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
> is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.

Of course, anything, such as a certain DEC machine, could be construed as
a threat to national security...

Wouldn't want any 'foreign nationals' getting their hands on a computer,
would we...<G>







Thread