1993-08-19 - Re: Traveller’s Checks…

Header Data

From: jim@tadpole.com (Jim Thompson)
To: pcw@access.digex.net
Message Hash: 0fa7ef62109ef218a2b96e3f2684eeb18bda35a64b06e1b417c1613042819829
Message ID: <9308192136.AA18425@chiba.tadpole.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-19 21:40:47 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Aug 93 14:40:47 PDT

Raw message

From: jim@tadpole.com (Jim Thompson)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 93 14:40:47 PDT
To: pcw@access.digex.net
Subject: Re: Traveller's Checks...
Message-ID: <9308192136.AA18425@chiba.tadpole.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> 
> I think that American Express wouldn't be interested in 
> anonymous cash because the most important "feature" of
> a traveller's check is the lack of transferability. Once
> they're bought, only one person can spend them. 

I doubt that Amex is interested in traveller's checks for this
reason.  AMEX likes traveller's checks because they make a lot
of money on the 'float', the time value of the money you give them
before they have to redeem the checks when some bank presents them
for payment.

A digital bank could make a lot of money on 'float' too.  Given that
anonymous cash could be much harder to steal than paper checks, AMEX
could very well be interested in this 'new' type of monetary instrument.

Jim




Thread