1993-08-27 - Re: .Comparing ViaCrypt and freeware.

Header Data

From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 17b977660322a37be16259c84ace2066cc974cbbd45624d0450f111be98e1cac
Message ID: <CCEDo7.EDA@twwells.com>
Reply To: <9308270131.AA13145@_micro.med.cornell.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-27 05:05:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 22:05:52 PDT

Raw message

From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 22:05:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: .Comparing ViaCrypt and freeware.
In-Reply-To: <9308270131.AA13145@_micro.med.cornell.edu>
Message-ID: <CCEDo7.EDA@twwells.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


If you're worried about backdoors, reverse engineer it and verify
that it works as advertised. Given that the program has to largely
duplicate an existing set of source, this should be trivial.

Thread

• Return to August 1993

• Return to “bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)”

• Unknown thread root

  • 1993-08-27 (Thu, 26 Aug 93 22:05:52 PDT) - Re: .Comparing ViaCrypt and freeware. - bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)