1993-08-20 - Re: Traveller’s Checks…

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 760bab88b2064379cb1716a46353553ec76451f4eaa28647984275ec91c9341e
Message ID: <9308201431.AA03899@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9308192350.AA12661@bass.chp.atmel.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-20 14:31:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 07:31:32 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 07:31:32 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Traveller's Checks...
In-Reply-To: <9308192350.AA12661@bass.chp.atmel.com>
Message-ID: <9308201431.AA03899@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Peter Baumbach says:
> Peter Wayner says:
> > I think that American Express wouldn't be interested in 
> > anonymous cash because the most important "feature" of
> > a traveller's check is the lack of transferability. Once
> > they're bought, only one person can spend them. 
> >[...]
> I think American Express would be interested in collecting a
> percentage of the cash-flow.  The underground economy is pretty
> big.  Wouldn't it be nice to get a percentage of it?

No. They have a special relationship with many governments around the
world and in order to keep it are extremely careful not to involve
themselves in anything that even remotely smells, especially after the
Safra affair a few years ago.

Perry





Thread