1993-09-20 - Re: Definition of “Zero Knowledge” (fwd)

Header Data

From: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Message Hash: 00bdabbeff52f69efad3c3f5257cb18e78b580f99ae629edd6958fa65d577602
Message ID: <9309200033.AA17197@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-20 00:36:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 17:36:57 PDT

Raw message

From: frc%bwnmr4@harvard.harvard.edu (Fred Cooper)
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 17:36:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Re: Definition of "Zero Knowledge" (fwd)
Message-ID: <9309200033.AA17197@bwnmr4.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Forwarded message:

> From frc Sun Sep 19 20:22:47 1993
> Subject: Re: Definition of "Zero Knowledge"
> To: erc@apple.com
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 93 20:22:47 EDT
> In-Reply-To: <m0oeGCo-00021LC@khijol>; from "Ed Carp" at Sep 18, 93 9:16 pm

> > Thanks for the definition (but I knew that, anyway).  Sorru I wasn't clear -
> > what I was looking for was examples of how zero-knowledge proof techniques
> > could make source code impenetrable.

> > Source would be nice, too... ;)

> Check out a product called C-Shroud by ??Gimpel Software...
> I think it does this.. or at least tries....

> FRC

I meant to send this across the list, and not just to erc.  Here's it is
for everyone else.

FRC





Thread