1993-09-30 - Re: FIDONet Censorship?

Header Data

From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 57834e0cc8eb2e695a8f509ba3d6c76442428a30f4a4530c4eaba035ea41d23d
Message ID: <9309302141.AA06835@triton.unm.edu>
Reply To: <9309301806.AA27173@netcom5.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-30 21:42:05 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:42:05 PDT

Raw message

From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:42:05 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: FIDONet Censorship?
In-Reply-To: <9309301806.AA27173@netcom5.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9309302141.AA06835@triton.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


According to Timothy C. May:
> 
> FIDONet operators are sometimes blocking encrypted messages. So what
> else is new?
> Their machines, their rules. Strictly speaking, this is not
> censorship.

I believe I stated this in my original post.  I have no problems with their
right to do this.  I simply wanted to make the point that we need to educate
these people.

> However, we can try to get them to change their rules. Better, route
> around such machines.
> 
> "The Net tends to view censorship as damage and routes around it."

I like it!


J. Michael Diehl   ;^)  |*The 2nd Amendment is there in case the 
mdiehl@triton.unm.edu   | Government forgets about the 1st!  <RL>
Mike.Diehl@f29.n301.z1  |*God is a good Physicist, and an even 
    .fidonet.org        | better Mathematician.  <Me>
al945@cwns9.ins.cwru.edu|*I'm just looking for the opportunity to 
 (505) 299-2282 (voice) | be Politically Incorrect! <Me>
Can we impeach him yet? |*Protected by 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703. 
PGP Key = 7C06F1 = A6 27 E1 1D 5F B2 F2 F1  12 E7 53 2D 85 A2 10 5D




Thread