1993-09-04 - Re: remailer reliability

Header Data

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6ae2a2b74373883a5cbca19d9c93f6161f841425d1ade20708b55ac03eefbab4
Message ID: <9309041137.aa03413@penet.penet.FI>
Reply To: <2298.2C87C75D@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-04 08:37:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Sep 93 01:37:17 PDT

Raw message

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 93 01:37:17 PDT
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: remailer reliability
In-Reply-To: <2298.2C87C75D@shelter.FIDONET.ORG>
Message-ID: <9309041137.aa03413@penet.penet.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



I still can't reply to M. Stirner because he still uses a illegal user name.

Double periods in a user name is a _bad_ idea. But perhaps he doesn't want
to receive any mail.

> repl: bad addresses:
> 	M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org (M. Stirner) -- no mailbox in local-part (.)

> Before the
> password mess on penet (which kills automagic replies, unfortunately, as
> they haven't passwords), I used the autoreplies that come form various
> US & foreign sites in response to alt.test postings as a good shakedown
> of penet remailer reliability.

Find out the facts first. You don't need passwords to send to anXXXX users.
Autoreplies work perfectly well. It's just that *your* real return address
doesn't work!

Sorry about sounding irritated, but we have discussed your dysfunctional return
address several times, and you haven't fixed it, instead blaiming the problems
on everything else...

	Julf






Thread