1993-09-23 - Forwarded Article

Header Data

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: harwell@panam.edu
Message Hash: 8804c4dce58b166134a7f985bfa92d8edaaba011d4c6b99baa8cdfd544245b97
Message ID: <11181@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-23 12:07:14 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Sep 93 05:07:14 PDT

Raw message

From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 93 05:07:14 PDT
To: harwell@panam.edu
Subject: Forwarded Article
Message-ID: <11181@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


This article was forwarded to you by gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal):

--------------------------------- cut here -----------------------------

Newsgroups: mail.cypher
Received: from post.demon.co.uk by mailhost.an-teallach.com with SMTP
        id AA11163 ; Thu, 23 Sep 93 12:41:47 GMT
Received: from relay2.uu.net by post.demon.co.uk id aa07673; 23 Sep 93 9:14 BST
Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
        (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA19504; Thu, 23 Sep 93 04:09:31 -0400
Received: by toad.com id AA29715; Thu, 23 Sep 93 01:03:46 PDT
Received: by toad.com id AA29712; Thu, 23 Sep 93 01:03:11 PDT
Return-Path: <karn@qualcomm.com>
Received: from qualcomm.com ([129.46.62.22]) by toad.com id AA29707; Thu, 23
 Sep 93 01:03:08 PDT
Received: from servo.qualcomm.com by qualcomm.com; id AA27850
        sendmail 5.65/QC-main-2.1 via SMTP
        Thu, 23 Sep 93 01:00:40 -0700 for cypherpunks@toad.com
Received: by servo; id AA10225
        sendmail 5.67/QC-subsidiary-2.1
        Thu, 23 Sep 93 01:00:39 -0700 for cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 93 01:00:39 -0700
From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Message-Id: <9309230800.AA10225@servo>
To: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: Carl Ellison's message of Tue, 14 Sep 93 23:53:23 EDT
 <9309150353.AA06198@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Subject: more than spread spectrum

This idea of setting up your own independent network isn't as far fetched
as it sounds, at least in a relatively local area with critical mass.

The router nodes already exist, in the form of my own TCP/IP code for
the PC, or any of several other packages including the various freeware
UNIX clones.

Radio transmission equipment operating under Part 15 of the FCC rules
is already available. Under Part 15, you don't need a license; the
radio transmitter does have to be "type accepted" by the FCC but since
you buy that as a prepackaged box you don't have to worry about it.

The section of Part 15 that is particularly interesting is either
15.247 or 15.249 (can't remember which).  It allows you to run up to 1
watt of power, quite a bit for an unlicensed service, on any of
several "ISM" (aka "garbage") bands as long as you use spread spectrum
with a minimum processing gain of 10dB. The most popular is 902-928
Mhz, with another band in the vicinity of 2450 Ghz coming up fast.
Ahthough most Part 15 equipment is designed primarily for use within
office environments, it can be and is used over point-to-point paths
of 5-10 km with the proper directional antennas.

Although Part 15 users are not allowed to cause harmful interference
and must accept interference from other users (microwave ovens
generally operate on 2450 Mhz), in practice these nets seem to work
pretty well if they're properly engineered. Besides, the inherent
distributed redundancy available in a packet network should be able to
compensate for momentary outages due to interference.

Unlike the amateur service, which has some particularly draconian
"acceptable use" policies (despite a recent liberalization, encryption
is still illegal), there are *no* restrictions on the use of Part 15
equipment. Encryption is not only legal, some boards have hardware
encryption support (e.g., the NCR Wavelan has a DES chip). This
particular board operates at 2 megabits/sec on the 902-928 Mhz band
with 250 mW of power.

There is an even more interesting development in the works: "data
PCS".  In essence, this is "Part 15" style operation on dedicated
spectrum, i.e., new spectrum in the 1.8-2.2 Ghz band that will not
have to be shared.  The specific intent of data PCS is to allow users
to build their own ad-hoc networks without having to rely on the facilities
of (and pay money to) carriers such as telephone companies.

Phil



--------------------------------- cut here -----------------------------






Thread