1993-09-05 - Re: Remailer Reliability

Header Data

From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9515bdc1b28c7ac5792efe8a8e58a4ef2ec1249708817146033d0a9e088c1fc4
Message ID: <9309051614.AA27793@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
Reply To: <9309040125.AA27752@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-05 16:21:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Sep 93 09:21:01 PDT

Raw message

From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 93 09:21:01 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Reliability
In-Reply-To: <9309040125.AA27752@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
Message-ID: <9309051614.AA27793@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Samuel Pigg wrote:
>go here. A simple command language for the remailers would allow
>the header construction software already being worked on by
>ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (CRM) and others to use tricks
>like this to defend against attacks. 

??

Header construction software for unix and pc's has existed for months
and is available at soda.berkeley.edu

Granted, I'm waiting to validate three of the remailers so the scripts
are a bit out of date, especially the dos batch files...

--
Karl L. Barrus: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu         
keyID: 5AD633 hash: D1 59 9D 48 72 E9 19 D5  3D F3 93 7E 81 B5 CC 32 

"One man's mnemonic is another man's cryptography" 
  - my compilers prof discussing file naming in public directories




Thread