1993-09-19 - Re: anon.penet.fi

Header Data

From: collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)
To: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Message Hash: b303caa170951ca190067d9aa84da617a160f22c6f7cee0ecacf71f269033f63
Message ID: <9309190057.AA01078@newton.apple.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-09-19 01:05:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 18:05:36 PDT

Raw message

From: collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 18:05:36 PDT
To: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Subject: Re: anon.penet.fi
Message-ID: <9309190057.AA01078@newton.apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  >Solution: if you send to na12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail won't
  >be pseudonymized; if you send to an12345@anon.penet.fi, then your mail
  >will be pseudonymized.

Good.  Therefore, remailers should translate 'Request-Remailing-To:'
addresses like this:

        if ( /an(\d+@anon.penet.fi)/ )  { s//na$1/; }

That is unless there are fifty other ways to say @anon.penet.fi.  In which
case, I would need to know the fifty ways.

Is this reasonable?


Scott Collins         | "Few people realize what tremendous power there
                      |  is in one of these things."     -- Willy Wonka
......................|................................................
BUSINESS.   voice:408.862.0540  fax:974.6094   collins@newton.apple.com
Apple Computer, Inc.   1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2C   Cupertino, CA 95014
.......................................................................
PERSONAL.   voice/fax:408.257.1746    1024:669687   catalyst@netcom.com






Thread