1993-10-18 - Dan Rather, et al. (WAS: Leisure Suit Larry)

Header Data

From: ferguson@icm1.icp.net (Paul Ferguson x2044)
To: perobich@ingr.com
Message Hash: 339f25408646bda19f33974ccc68b0afdd32ced84607ad113739a6c0837ddb6e
Message ID: <9310182312.AA02437@icm1.icp.net>
Reply To: <199310182026.AA12159@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-18 22:12:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:30 PDT

Raw message

From: ferguson@icm1.icp.net (Paul Ferguson x2044)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:30 PDT
To: perobich@ingr.com
Subject: Dan Rather, et al. (WAS: Leisure Suit Larry)
In-Reply-To: <199310182026.AA12159@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Message-ID: <9310182312.AA02437@icm1.icp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



> > Uh, its not "Lance," its "Larry" Detweiler, as in Leisure Suit
> > Larry. (Sorry, Larry.)
> 
> Well, Dorothy Denning referred to "Larry Detwiler"'s comments on the
> ITAR in the latest RISKS, which I don't have handy.  I always thought
> it was Lance.
> 
> Could there be more than one? Is "tcmay" also posing as one of the L.
> Detwilers? Are we being pseudospoofed? Maybe someone should call Dan
> Rather.

I've been sitting back, watching the signal-to-noise on the list
fluctuate with a smidgeon of a grin on my face.
 
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

Personally, I think that the list is just going through a few minor 
changes, the worst of which are new people checking into "something that 
they had heard about."

Face it -- the net grows a bit more "open" every day.

As far as Dan Rather goes, I'd bet he wouldn't even understand.

,-)

Cheers,

_____________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ferguson                                                               
Mindbank Consulting Group                                    fergp@sytex.com   
Fairfax, Virginia  USA                                       ferguson@icp.net




Thread