1993-10-09 - Re: The death of the list as we know it (tm)

Header Data

From: “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
To: mbl@ml7694a.leonard.american.edu
Message Hash: d73ff7ae1caab193dc774d08badb7bb1ea7abfa317d2d65cd5037b71bab1f7fa
Message ID: <72951.pfarrell@netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-09 00:15:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 17:15:48 PDT

Raw message

From: "Pat Farrell" <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 17:15:48 PDT
To: mbl@ml7694a.leonard.american.edu
Subject: Re: The death of the list as we know it (tm)
Message-ID: <72951.pfarrell@netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message Fri, 8 Oct 93 14:08:50 EST,
  Matthew B. Landry <mbl@ml7694a.leonard.american.edu>  writes:
> I really think that the powers that be should consider the
> newsgroup  idea.

I have to comment. Many on this list believe strongly in privacy. This
implies that no one admits to being a PTB (power that be).

Others are anarchists and don't believe in PTB. And occasional person wants
to be in charge of the anarchy movement.

Options include:
1. get a rational mail reader (nupop, eudora, etc.) and a rational vendor
  (netcom, digex, world, well, etc.) and read at your leisure.
2. convert it locally to a local newgroup. then use rn, tin, etc. with kill
   files.
3. unsubscribe.
4. alternate plan X.

I have no problem with the volume. The S/N ratio could be better, but so
could my bank account.

Pat

Pat Farrell      Grad Student                 pfarrell@netcom.com
Department of Computer Science    George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Public key availble via finger          #include <standard.disclaimer>





Thread