1993-11-11 - Re: Should we oppose the

Header Data

From: smb@research.att.com
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Message Hash: 36a8deedac66dddcb31b0389da37c4d98efb3109f48692516636091f732d8351
Message ID: <9311112100.AA01913@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-11 21:03:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 13:03:32 PST

Raw message

From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 13:03:32 PST
To: pmetzger@lehman.com
Subject: Re: Should we oppose the
Message-ID: <9311112100.AA01913@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	 Why did virtually all the railroads in the northern U.S. use the same
	 rail gauge BEFORE regulation of the railroads?

Ah -- you specify the ``northern'' U.S.  The situation in the south
was very different.  And even in the north, the Pennsylvania Railroad
was so large (they're the ones who billed themselves as ``the standard
railroad of the world) that other folks had to follow if they came near
the PRR.  It was near-monopoly that created that situation, not any
desire for co-operation.

In Europe, there are still a variety of different gauges, electrical
standards, loading gauges, etc.  (Actually, the latter two are problems
in the U.S. as well.)





Thread