1993-11-14 - Re: Should we oppose the Data Superhighway/NII?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Message Hash: a000494d98254546071c138994c161693887b1c01e4a254f6fdef01bc562dcc0
Message ID: <9311142218.AA07162@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199311132012.MAA21160@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-14 23:33:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 15:33:57 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 15:33:57 PST
To: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Subject: Re: Should we oppose the Data Superhighway/NII?
In-Reply-To: <199311132012.MAA21160@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9311142218.AA07162@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Doug Merritt says:
> My point in saying this is that you're speaking as if current day video
> standards are some kind of ultimate load on information transmission,

No, not at all (although limits to quality are in striking range -- CD
audio is as good as human ears can hear, and 24 bits of color is
actually overkill for the discrimination capacity of the human eye). I
merely mention "thousands of video channels" because people are used
to the bandwidth requirements of conventional video so it gives them a
sense of scale.

Perry





Thread