1993-11-17 - Re: privacy and rights (long reply)

Header Data

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: a21bf5fdce655c015e64c0f23b0e36edc6b081deb52ff5df9e4dbf7b3f6b8333
Message ID: <199311171332.IAA07582@eff.org>
Reply To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-17 13:34:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 05:34:22 PST

Raw message

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 05:34:22 PST
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: privacy and rights (long reply)
In-Reply-To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
Message-ID: <199311171332.IAA07582@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 
Black Unicorn writes:

> Mike or another with legal expertise can correct me, but I 
> believe it hasbeen shown more than once that privacy can be a 
> necessary condition for freedom of expression.

In fact, the right to privacy has been held to be implicit in the 
Bill of Rights. See Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965.


--Mike







Thread