1993-12-22 - Re: eavesdropping detection

Header Data

From: sdw@meaddata.com (Stephen Williams)
To: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Anonymous)
Message Hash: 37901a3b4ecca371ac272ab3d0a2459c96d3c268ef9e82980547db800ac89d79
Message ID: <9312221452.AA24071@jungle.meaddata.com>
Reply To: <9312220304.AA20790@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-22 14:55:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Dec 93 06:55:31 PST

Raw message

From: sdw@meaddata.com (Stephen Williams)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 93 06:55:31 PST
To: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Anonymous)
Subject: Re: eavesdropping detection
In-Reply-To: <9312220304.AA20790@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9312221452.AA24071@jungle.meaddata.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Normally, by a near-field receiver.  I don't know of any other way.

An AM band unit is about $110 and an FM band unit is $200-400.

I've seen ads for the AM band and I saw the FM unit at Hamvention in Dayton.

The AM band unit can detect FM transmissions, you just can't hear the
traffic, it's just quiet.  It was also advertised to be able to detect
leaking microwaves, etc.

If I understand it, nearfield receivers and frequency counters rely on
the relative strength surrounding a transmitter at close range to sync
with the frequency.  No tuning at all.

> How would one go about detecting any suspected eavedropping devices
> in one's home in an inexpensive fashion? Sorry about the off-topic
> question, but what the heck.


sdw
-- 
Stephen D. Williams  Local Internet Gateway Co.; SDW Systems 513 496-5223APager
LIG dev./sales       Internet: sdw@lig.net CIS 76244.210@compuserve.com
OO R&D Source Dist.  By Horse: 2464 Rosina Dr., Miamisburg, OH 45342-6430
GNU Support          ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W I love it when a plan comes together




Thread