1993-12-20 - Re: Bobby Inman’s Zoe Baird problem

Header Data

From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@stout.atd.ucar.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3a67a9cc3ef80647c9185264292add978ace64ad467e8f2ccc30b5147fa5c711
Message ID: <9312202246.AA10966@stout.atd.ucar.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-20 22:49:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 20 Dec 93 14:49:17 PST

Raw message

From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@stout.atd.ucar.EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 93 14:49:17 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bobby Inman's Zoe Baird problem
Message-ID: <9312202246.AA10966@stout.atd.ucar.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Freedom lovers rejoice!  An instance of the ``Zoe Baird problem'' may
> accomplish what we could only dream: the derailment of the Inman
> nomination.

Well, if Inman goes down I suppose I will do some rejoicing.  However, this
is also kind of depressing.  Something as important as a Cabinet nomination
can be wiped out by something that is really irrelevant (have you ever
looked into just how *hard* it is to employ a nanny on the books?); while
we all acknowledge that our really serious concerns will have no effect.
Anybody who is concerned about freedom in this country should ought to be
pretty scared when decisions this important are made in this way.

Not that this example is anything particularly new...

Jonathan Corbet
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Technology Division
corbet@stout.atd.ucar.edu





Thread