1993-12-10 - Electronic Cash Card

Header Data

From: Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4a1b091aace04ef3947d02369ab4a6827ca2d7be4ffdcbcef7f7f6bd330d41f2
Message ID: <01H6AQ2GCU7M934ZCS@delphi.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-10 06:59:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Dec 93 22:59:19 PST

Raw message

From: Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 93 22:59:19 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Electronic Cash Card
Message-ID: <01H6AQ2GCU7M934ZCS@delphi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Payments between individuals are carried out by inserting the card into a
>pocket sized electronic wallet and making 6 key strokes. Customers and
>retailers can deposit money into thier bank accounts over the phone.

If A can transfer to B offline, and B can transfer to C without
calling into the bank first, this has to be either security-
through-obscurity or non-anonymous at some level. You could stack
digital signatures to represent a transfer chain. But you can't pass
anonymous digicash from one person to the other without the possibility
of double spending. Unless of course the recipient is required to dial
in before using the received cash, in which case it isn't offline. 

If this system is truly offline (i.e. not cryptographicall secured),
somebody is going to figure out how to rip it off.

>However, cards could be locked to prevent unauthorised use by tapping in a
>four digit personal code. Once locked, the money could not be spent without
 ~~~~~~~~~~
>reentering the code.

At least you don't have to worry about a brute-force search ;-)





Thread