1994-02-16 - Re: AT&T stopped talking to me

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 31b637daa6498e606d0fb56f81a4ecc6e2cae0b5350676e25e8295487d68dd6d
Message ID: <9402161752.AA02808@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9402161732.AA00888@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 17:55:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:55:09 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:55:09 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: AT&T stopped talking to me
In-Reply-To: <9402161732.AA00888@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <9402161752.AA02808@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Mike McNally says:
> 
> This could be a simple case of AT&T being unwilling to foster
> competition against themselves.  The only way to combat something like
> that would be from an anti-trust standpoint (highly unlikely here,
> probably). 
> 
> Is AT&T the only company that sells such a device?

Qualcomm sells a chip that implements QCELP.

.pm

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to “m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”

• Return to “rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)”

• 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:05:15 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:35:09 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:55:09 PST) - Re: AT&T stopped talking to me - “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:45:09 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)