cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1994-02-28 - Re: standard for stegonography?

Header Data

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
To: cypherpunks-errors@toad.com
Message Hash: 78e68eb3343230b4a5aaf73f43b8ea67e25a88fbcfafd7f50aab4b4e15c6165d
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9402281554.A10807-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Reply To: <9402281021.AA23225@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-28 20:09:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 12:09:36 PST

Raw message

From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 12:09:36 PST
To: cypherpunks-errors@toad.com
Subject: Re: standard for stegonography?
In-Reply-To: <9402281021.AA23225@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9402281554.A10807-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Mon, 28 Feb 1994, Matthew Gream wrote:

> Earlier, Sergey Goldgaber wrote:
> 
> > 
> > If you're using one-time pads, why use PGP?  _Public_ Key Cryptography...?
> > 
> 
> Huh ? The discussion was about a standard format for stego'd files,
> so that different software could interoperate, unless I wildly 
> misinterpreted.
> 
> Matthew.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Gream. ph: (02)-821-2043. M.Gream@uts.edu.au.
> PGPMail and brown paperbags accepted. - Non Servatum -
>   ''weirdo's make the world go around'' - A.Watts
> 

Didn't you mention something along the lines of hiding "---BEGIN PGP" headers
by using one-time pad encryption?  Or did I wildly misinterpret you?


Sergey

Thread