1994-02-14 - Re: alt.steganography

Header Data

From: Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
To: Xenon <qwerty@netcom.com>
Message Hash: c2a57958c6ed82eeed9469c809e9ed98ed06b76d1cc21dc2170822ed214c7aca
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9402141111.B1446-0100000@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
Reply To: <199402140833.AAA20162@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-14 09:21:19 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Feb 94 01:21:19 PST

Raw message

From: Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 94 01:21:19 PST
To: Xenon <qwerty@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: alt.steganography
In-Reply-To: <199402140833.AAA20162@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9402141111.B1446-0100000@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> How 'bout it? At least tell me what the "proper" name should be for
> the group. sci.steganography will take to long to get approved.
> alt.steganography is OK, but isn't alt.security.steganography more
> correct?

I think that alt.security.steganography would be a reasonable choice.
Please discuss it in alt.config; don't just create the group.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>”
• Return to “qwerty@netcom.com (Xenon)”

• Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”

• 1994-02-14 (Mon, 14 Feb 94 00:41:16 PST) - alt.steganography - qwerty@netcom.com (Xenon)
  • 1994-02-14 (Mon, 14 Feb 94 01:21:19 PST) - Re: alt.steganography - Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
  • 1994-02-14 (Mon, 14 Feb 94 02:01:21 PST) - Re: alt.steganography - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)