1994-02-03 - Re: SASE Suggestion

Header Data

From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f1a668ac1e7dac76682e54dd4763cc11ae46a5222e1963acef3d085e93d26b02
Message ID: <9402032330.AA18898@bilbo.suite.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-03 23:39:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 15:39:44 PST

Raw message

From: jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 94 15:39:44 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SASE Suggestion
Message-ID: <9402032330.AA18898@bilbo.suite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Lance Cottrell writes:

> One SASE scheme recently suggested involved sending a
> request for a SASE to a ramailer, stating the number of
> jumps required. It then sent it to another remailer, and
> so on. Each adding a layer, and eventually sending the
> results to the desired correspondent. I mentioned that
> if the first remailer was corrupted, that the whole chain
> was (it would only send to other corrupt remailers). 

> 


Oh, I see.  I was confused as to which scheme you were talking about.  You  
were refering (I think) to the "prepaid mailer" idea Tim May described in  
his "Re: Anonymous Anonymous ftp" post of Jan 27.


Jim_Miller@suite.com





Thread