1994-02-07 - Re: TEMPEST - Electronic eavesdropping

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: R.O.Jackson-SE1@computer-science.birmingham.ac.uk
Message Hash: fca66c32f20d3ffaa9f6883d8323a33ed1b96688c9cc9659ff411cc9e866fbdb
Message ID: <199402071617.LAA04702@snark>
Reply To: <13893.9402062244@heffalump.cs.bham.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-07 16:21:22 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 08:21:22 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 08:21:22 PST
To: R.O.Jackson-SE1@computer-science.birmingham.ac.uk
Subject: Re: TEMPEST - Electronic eavesdropping
In-Reply-To: <13893.9402062244@heffalump.cs.bham.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <199402071617.LAA04702@snark>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



R.O.Jackson-SE1@computer-science.birmingham.ac.uk says:
> In the US it not illegal to posess TEMPEST-surveillance equipment but
> it is illegal to take appropriate counter-measures to prevent 
> surveillance.

This is not true. This is an urban legend that doesn's of fools keep
posting over and over again. There is nothing illegal against
shielding your equipment -- in fact you are legally obliged to reduce
emmissions so as not to interfere with radio and TV signals.

Perry





Thread