1994-03-05 - Re: more steganography talk
Header Data
From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Message Hash: 15ad646b84096f261b7b64da0f2fb364f34eab2ee793d0f0e240043ca48ae1a5
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9403050304.H28008-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Reply To: <9403042001.AA02468@bilbo.suite.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-05 08:03:32 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 00:03:32 PST
Raw message
From: Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 00:03:32 PST
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Subject: Re: more steganography talk
In-Reply-To: <9403042001.AA02468@bilbo.suite.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9403050304.H28008-0100000@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 4 Mar 1994, Jim Miller wrote:
> In my mind, the perfect steganography system depends upon either an
> environment containing ubiquitous random bit sequences or a
> reversible algorithm that can transform non-random bit sequences into
> random bit sequences without using encryption (unlikely).
Such is the function of Mimic, available at ftp.cs.cornell.edu
in /pub/wayner/Mimic
It holds the most promise for steganography, in my oppinion. Unfortunately,
it may be difficult to implement, initially.
Sergey
Thread
Return to March 1994
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”
Return to “Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>”
- 1994-03-04 (Fri, 4 Mar 94 12:06:36 PST) - more steganography talk - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
- 1994-03-04 (Fri, 4 Mar 94 13:00:18 PST) - more steganography talk - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-03-05 (Sat, 5 Mar 94 00:03:32 PST) - Re: more steganography talk - Sergey Goldgaber <sergey@delbruck.pharm.sunysb.edu>