1994-03-14 - Re: Nature of RSA’s patent

Header Data

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: mnemonic@eff.org
Message Hash: 25c650a8d5949478775b57be4b925e3e6e057ae6266b5086404b6de9d732dfb1
Message ID: <199403142026.MAA20629@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <199403141932.OAA18636@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-14 20:27:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Mar 94 12:27:31 PST

Raw message

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 94 12:27:31 PST
To: mnemonic@eff.org
Subject: Re: Nature of RSA's patent
In-Reply-To: <199403141932.OAA18636@eff.org>
Message-ID: <199403142026.MAA20629@servo.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Why should my incoming PGP-encrypted communications be automatically considered
"infringing products", since I've got a copy of ViaCrypt PGP that was
produced under license from Public Key Partners?

Phil

Thread

• Return to March 1994

• Return to “Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>”
• Return to “Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>”

• Return to ““strick – strick AT versant DOT com – henry strickland” <strick@osc.versant.com>”

• 1994-03-14 (Mon, 14 Mar 94 10:32:23 PST) - Nature of RSA’s patent - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
  • 1994-03-14 (Mon, 14 Mar 94 10:55:11 PST) - Re: Nature of RSA’s patent - “strick – strick AT versant DOT com – henry strickland” <strick@osc.versant.com>
    • 1994-03-14 (Mon, 14 Mar 94 11:32:56 PST) - Re: Nature of RSA’s patent - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
      • 1994-03-14 (Mon, 14 Mar 94 12:27:31 PST) - Re: Nature of RSA’s patent - Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
        • 1994-03-14 (Mon, 14 Mar 94 12:43:15 PST) - Re: Nature of RSA’s patent - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>