1994-03-05 - Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2661f544bf5fde549bb219663bc4104bd7850c90d18139d7cf3801f85f3acdbf
Message ID: <9403052139.AA10905@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9403052131.AA10882@andria.lehman.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-05 21:39:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 13:39:43 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 94 13:39:43 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Update on user-level hack to do telnet encryption posted recently
In-Reply-To: <9403052131.AA10882@andria.lehman.com>
Message-ID: <9403052139.AA10905@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"Perry E. Metzger" says:
> As for this current "idea", with an implementation of an encrypted
> STANDARD telnet already written and likely available soon for
> anonymous FTP, I think I'm being sane, not "a wet blanket".

By the way, I forgot to mention, the 4.4 BSD domestic release already
includes the encrypted telnet. In order to head off foolish
reimplementation, perhaps someone would be willing to release the
relevant patches to the NE release to turn it into a full encrypting
telnet? The code is, after all, already under the Berkeley copyright
and thus releasable.

Perry





Thread