1994-03-13 - Re: “ordinary public”

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2840f342a67b79f5cc58a3a6106023a23c5247c2b601b6e8cebb46039e38b00b
Message ID: <9403130759.AA16501@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-13 08:00:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 00:00:27 PST

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 00:00:27 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "ordinary public"
Message-ID: <9403130759.AA16501@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> rishab@dxm.ernet.in writes:
>  > It's not a good idea to take this debate to the ordinary public...
>  > Time readers, yes...
> 
> Well, if "Time readers" aren't the ordinary public, then I give up.

Well, they're a subset of the ordinary public that both reads and
has some interest in news issues, but that's a reasonably good start.
The folks who only watch TV are a bit different audience,
and the folks who don't care about news are less likely to vote...





Thread