1994-03-24 - A public alternative to clipper?

Header Data

From: an62213@anon.penet.fi (I wish I knew!)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 981de6c044591460ac9150737872c3959caef91494c41e7f9d488222ac8af890
Message ID: <9403241502.AA01318@anon.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-24 15:55:05 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 07:55:05 PST

Raw message

From: an62213@anon.penet.fi (I wish I knew!)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 07:55:05 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: A public alternative to clipper?
Message-ID: <9403241502.AA01318@anon.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 	Also, the development of clipper was done with tax dollars.
> The government has no need to recoup its investment in developing the
> chip.  Therefore, they can sell the chips at the cost of
> manufacturing, and forget the R&D.  That ability to ignore the bottom
> line is a pretty powerful mechanism.  If a clipper phone costs $100
> less than the alternative, because we the taxpayers already paid for
> it, Clipper becomes more and more the only choice.

Well, then.  Maybe it's time to develop our own PGP chip.  Would the
PGP routines fit in a large PGA?  What's the smallest, cheapest alternative
we can come up with?  If we give away the PGA code freely, that would
help reduce the cost of inclusion in a commercial product.  An FPGA would 
give the user the ability to change keys with little trouble.  Upgrading
is as easy as swapping a prom.  (Better yet have an onboard programmer.)

Even then, I would guess that a lot of people would have to pay a bit more
for secure communications.  I think it's worth it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.





Thread